Re: Bug#29874: optional packages that should be extra
Hi,
>>"Joseph" == Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> writes:
Joseph> On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 05:53:58PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I must confess that even I thought the the policy statement meant
>> that one should be able to install all optional packages
>> simultaneously.
Joseph> This would seem to indicate policy needs to be altered to
Joseph> indicate the user may install optional packages without fear
Joseph> of breaking anything in above priorities, but that they might
Joseph> conflict with eachother.
Actually, the policy is quite cleart, it was my memory at
fault. But since I am not the only one, perhaps an explanatory
footnote is in order?
manoj
--
Q: How many Oregonians does it take to screw in a light bulb? A:
Three. One to screw in the lightbulb and two to fend off all those
Californians trying to share the experience.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: