Re: Configuration management, revision 3
Craig Brozefsky wrote:
> Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> writes:
> > It already has if statements. Richard said he wanted to add some stuff to
^ Wichert, not Richard. oops
> Agreed. I think it's a bit on the complicated side already. I was
> answering your question of what was the difference, not suggesting we
> indeed use it for the question backend. He was using it to define
> some higher level data structures, something I think we can both agree
> shell was not really designed for.
Yes - if you look at my proposal, I didn't propose using the shell for the
data definitions.
> I think that the proposal put forth in Manoj's synopsis is much
> simpler, and more tractable than either the shell script mechanism or
> the specialty language.
I read Manoj's synopsis, and I read the original messages he quoted, and I
never saw a concrete proposal in there. I saw a list of requirements that
all dealt with the database of questions and how the databases could be
used. I agree with most of it, but am I missing a proposal with the same
depth as Wichert's proposel in there?
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: