Re: `Every package must have exactly one maintainer'
Hi,
>>"James" == James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk> writes:
James> This is IMHO a trite argument ...
Umm, trite? yes. Banal? maybe. Correct? I hope so. I am sorry
I could not jazz up my arguments to meet your standards of
entertainement ;-)
What *did* you mean here? Surely you are not against hackneyed
arguments, no matter for germane and correct they are?
manoj
confused
--
If you want to see useful Perl examples, we can certainly arrange to
have comp.lang.misc flooded with them, but I don't think that would
help the advance of civilization. :-) --Larry Wall in
<1992Mar5.180926.19041@netlabs.com>
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: