Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases

[Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>]

Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl> writes:
> 
>  Wichert> I reopened it since your reason for closing it was
>  Wichert> false.
> 
> 	Incorrect? Does not false imply intent?

Not in computing science :)  I don't know what the terminology is 
in the US, but over here "false" just means "not true".

>  Wichert> Feel free to close this, as long as you also file bugs
>  Wichert> against sendmail and exim at the same time to resolve this.
> 
> 	I shall file a bug against sendmail ,which I do have
>  installed. I shan't file one against exim, since I can't verify that,
>  and some one has posted saying that exim does not declare
>  /etc/aliases a conffile.

It was sendmail and smail, not exim.  I grepped the lintian lab for this.

Richard Braakman