Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Hi,
>>"Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl> writes:
Wichert> I reopened it since your reason for closing it was
Wichert> false.
Incorrect? Does not false imply intent?
Wichert> Feel free to close this, as long as you also file bugs
Wichert> against sendmail and exim at the same time to resolve this.
I shall file a bug against sendmail ,which I do have
installed. I shan't file one against exim, since I can't verify that,
and some one has posted saying that exim does not declare
/etc/aliases a conffile.
I am closing this report.
manoj
--
Your csh still thinks true is false. Write to your vendor today and
tell them that next year Configure ought to "rm /bin/csh" unless they
fix their blasted shell. :-) --Larry Wall in Configure from the perl
distribution
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: