Re: Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Adam Di Carlo <apharris@burrito.onshore.com> writes:
> > If "do not modify a configuration file of another package" is just a
> > general rule, it should be clear how many exceptions to the rule are
> > there.
>
> There are no exceptions.
I think there is at least one exception:
(from version 2.5.0.0 of the Policy Manual
4.7. Configuration files
------------------------
* * * *
If two or more packages use the same configuration file, one of these
packages has to be defined as _owner_ of the configuration file, i.e.,
it has to list the file as `conffile' and has to provide a program
that modifies the configuration file.
The other packages have to depend on the _owner_ package and use that
program to update the configuration file.
* * * *
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <hilliard@flinet.com>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
Reply to: