[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#29770: marked as done (Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases)



Your message dated 28 Nov 1998 15:47:52 -0600
with message-id <[🔎] 87af1bpjzr.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>
and subject line Bug#29770: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 1998 15:46:57 +0000
Received: (qmail 3144 invoked from network); 20 Nov 1998 15:46:56 -0000
Received: from pizarro.unex.es (root@158.49.8.2)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Nov 1998 15:46:56 -0000
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (root@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
	by pizarro.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA01558
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 16:46:50 +0100
Received: from cantor.unex.es (sanvila@cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105])
	by guadiana.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA09029
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 16:46:49 +0100
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 16:46:34 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Debian Bugs <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Policy contradicts itself about /etc/aliases
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.981120163026.1492A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Package: debian-policy
Version: 2.5.0.0

I have discovered a little inconsistency in the policy.

Section 5.5, "Mail transport agents" says:

   "/etc/aliases is the source file for the system mail aliases (e.g.,
   postmaster, usenet, etc.)--it is the one which the sysadmin and
   postinst scripts may edit."

According to this, a postinst script *may* edit /etc/aliases.

However, section 4.7, "Configuration files" says:

   "A package may not modify a configuration file of another package."

According to this, editing /etc/aliases is not allowed, since
this file is a conffile for sendmail, at least, and certainly it
is a "configuration file" in either case.

So, which is the truth, may /etc/aliases be edited by a postinst, or it
may not?

If "do not modify a configuration file of another package" is just a
general rule, it should be clear how many exceptions to the rule are
there.

Thanks.

-- 
 "85438ed58b89b28d0dec167b46f14221" (a truly random sig)


Reply to: