[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates



On Oct 30, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
 
 >     To prevent having to use epochs for every new upstream version, the
 >     version number should be changed to the following format in such
 >     cases: `1996-05-01', `1996-12-24'. It is up to the maintainer whether
What about 960501? It's shorter.
(This format has NO Y2K problems.)

-- 
ciao,
Marco


Reply to: