Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates

To: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, 17621@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
From: "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <salve@debian.org>
Date: 01 Nov 1998 23:47:37 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87sog3ghdi.fsf@hal.olympus.fake>
In-reply-to: md@linux.it's message of "Sat, 31 Oct 1998 12:21:58 +0100"
References: <87btmutq2q.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <[🔎] 19981031122158.A430@wonderland>

***** Md => Marco d'Itri

Md> What about 960501? It's shorter.  (This format has NO Y2K
Md> problems.)

I'd bet 000501 is earlier to dpkg than 990501. ;-)

Regards,

-- 
Davide G. M. Salvetti - IW5DZC [JN53fr] - <http://salve.home.ml.org/>

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
  - From: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#17621: [PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Next by Date: Re: RfD: Policy of .sh boot scripts
Previous by thread: Bug#17621: PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Next by thread: Re: Bug#17621: PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread