[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Configuration management, revision 3



Previously Joey Hess wrote:
> One other problem I have with the proposal is that it assumes that questions
> will be askedsequentially. But, this means that you won't be able to answer
> a question, go on to the next, and then go back. (Except within a block of
> questions that are all displayed at once of course.) The ability to go back
> and change a previous answer is IMHO very important for the GUI frontends.
> But I'm afraid it would require a very different interaction between the
> frontend and backend..

There are two different problems here:
1 - going back to a previous step in the configuration of a single package.
    This would make the configmodule for packages a lot more complex
2 - going back to a previous package should not be that hard, just call
    the configmodule again.

Of course the ultimate solution would be to have a language in which you
can formulate the decision process. Something like prolog would be suitable
I guess. I think that would be a too large step to implement at once though.

Wichert.

-- 
==============================================================================
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: wakkerma@wi.LeidenUniv.nl
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/

Attachment: pgpZWj2b9C_OO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: