Re: Configuration management, revision 3
Previously Joey Hess wrote:
> This is a great proposal.
Thanks!
> But, it misses some of the stuff Ian Jackson proposed on an earlier thread
> on this subject. He was talking about allowing for completly unattended
> installs, as well as having a way to only see very important questions, etc.
What's wrong with using the non-interactive frontends? Or a non-interactive
option for normal frontends?
> Could we add some kind of a priority value to the interface commands, so
> that if they are of too low a priority, the frontend ignores them and
> returns the defaults?
I haven't got Ian's proposal in my archives here. Can you mail it or do
you have an URL somewhere?
> It'd also be nice to have some way for the TEXT command to be logged to an
> installation notes log of some sort, in some cases.
TEXT is currently defined is a method to add explanatory text to the
questions. Maybe we should add a command oposite to GO, which says
"start building a new display, of type (error|message|input)". Then
we could ditch the RESET command and use that instead. Maybe even add
a priority flag to it..
Wichert.
--
==============================================================================
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: wakkerma@wi.LeidenUniv.nl
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: