Re: `Every package must have exactly one maintainer'

To: Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: `Every package must have exactly one maintainer'
From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>
Date: 11 Apr 1998 14:57:10 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] dmmhg40wjex.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: James Troup's message of "11 Apr 1998 13:52:34 +0100"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980411141230.26198C-100000@monet> <[🔎] dmmbtu8tt9p.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>

James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk> writes:

> [ ... ] pgp maintenance [ ... ]

Major thinko.  s/pgp/debian keyring/g

-- 
James


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: `Every package must have exactly one maintainer'
  - From: Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>
- Re: `Every package must have exactly one maintainer'
  - From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Locales and Programs parsing other's output
Next by Date: Re: Wht remove /usr/local dirs in prerm rather than postrm?
Previous by thread: Re: `Every package must have exactly one maintainer'
Next by thread: Re: `Every package must have exactly one maintainer'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread