Re: libtool varying versions

To: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libtool varying versions
From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 08:27:08 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980317082411.24752B-100000@simula.efis.ucr.ac.cr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] y9hu38xddjt.fsf@always.got.net>

On 16 Mar 1998, Ben Gertzfield wrote:

> Do I remove the newer libtool from the upstream source and replace
> it with the current libtool in the Debian distribution?

add "libtoolize --force --copy" to debian/rules. This would make
your package source-depend on libtool. And automake maybe. 
Definitely autoconf. In the process Makefile.in -> Makefile the
m4 macros are expanded, and ./configure should be regenerated
just to make sure the libtool m4 macros are not different from
those used upstream.

			Marcelo

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libtool varying versions
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

References:
- libtool varying versions
  - From: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>

Prev by Date: csh-considered-harmful is a lintian warning??
Next by Date: Re: libtool varying versions
Previous by thread: Re: libtool varying versions
Next by thread: Re: libtool varying versions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread