Re: Conclusion of the absolute/relative links issu?
On 27 Feb 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did we ever reach a consensus about the relative vs absolute
> links in packages? Was it decided that links between top level
> directories should be absolute, whereas links within on should be
> relative?
Yes, I think we've reached a consensus about that. However, this hasn't
been `officially approved' or incorporated in the manuals yet. I'll
include it in the next policy weekly posting.
> If so, here is a patch for lintian, and after the patch comes
> a self sufficient test program for the patch.
Great!! Thanks for the patch. (I have a few notes to the script, but I'll
reply in private mail since I don't think that's intresting for the others
here.)
Thanks,
Chris
PS: I was really happy to see you providing the patch! As lintian uses a
very modular design it should be easy for others to contribute new checks.
Patches are always welcome!
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@schwarz-online.com,
! ___; schwarz@debian.org, schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de
\ /
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
Reply to: