Re: [Fwd: dhelp support?]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hello.
Marco Budde has asked me to add dhelp support in debmake (he even sent me
patches), but there is a doc-base package planned for Debian 2.1. Since it
seems that doc-base and dhelp will have very similar goals, I don't think
it is a good idea to support dhelp (through debmake or not) at this
moment, because we will easily end up having two incompatible document
systems.
This does not mean I don't like the dhelp idea (well, in fact I don't like
invisible files being in /usr/doc :-), but not for hamm.
Marco, I would suggest you to collaborate in the writing of doc-base.
Perhaps a modified dhelp could be an important part of it.
Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNLO9JCqK7IlOjMLFAQELpgP/e+sOm6XBvmR/AuJk61BZw45d5U+RaV6+
KPOCkyXWsX1gjvsG5I4LoGslVtrvOR2jnsbdOJ/50VEDtpX/4yNNL8uhL/s8AVoO
SpSA/rr2SzFWTnqyIh5PqZUEkHSxjqh7pKKuWLz2EfH9qsaHg/VmYi5TEFCAvzF6
Cg19L1iN8b8=
=A7CF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: