Re: additional virtual packages for kde

[Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>]

In article <[🔎] 19971127001911.11766@dungeon.inka.de> you wrote:

: their packages are available, ours not...

I think there are two things that I must have missed in the discussion on this
topic:

	- why are there two sets of KDE packages?  One should be sufficient.

	- why can't "your" KDE packages be made available just as easily as
	  the other set?  If Incoming is backlogged, put the files somewhere
	  else that folks can get to them.

For the record, I don't see any value in usign virtual packages for these
conflicts.  The non-Debian packages should conflict with the Debian packages,
and have self-consistent dependencies.  That is sufficient.

Bdale