Re: final bo-updates naming scheme

To: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: final bo-updates naming scheme
From: Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 22:31:24 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.971209223019.8104D-100000@monet>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19971203154212.47713@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au>

On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote:

> Can someone post the final agreed bo-updates naming scheme?

Which naming scheme? There has only been a "versioning" scheme discussed
yet. The package names will be the same as in the "hamm" version.

I'll send a proposal for the "bo-unstable policy" to debian-devel out
soon. In case you need the "versioning scheme" before that, just drop me
a note and I'll send you the previous posting.


Thanks,

Chris

--                  Christian Schwarz
                     schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@schwarz-online.com,
Debian has a logo!    schwarz@debian.org, schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de
                    
Check out the logo     PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7  34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
pages at  http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-logo/

Reply to:

References:
- final bo-updates naming scheme
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Backspace and delete
Next by Date: Re: proposed minimum function of /etc/init.d scripts
Previous by thread: final bo-updates naming scheme
Next by thread: crontab
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread