Re: When to get the upstream maintainer involved.

To: Bruce Perens <bruce@pixar.com>, pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: When to get the upstream maintainer involved.
From: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens)
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 97 17:13 PDT
Message-id: <m0xNRx0-00IS1IC@golem.pixar.com>
Reply-to: Bruce Perens <bruce@pixar.com>
References: <m0xNPuH-00J4hIC@golem.pixar.com>

> I think that you're being a little too strict in your policy, Bruce.

This is in response to a complaint from Ted Tso's, who is the upstream
maintainer of e2fsutils. He said that Red Hat takes care of its own bugs,
and we should as well. I have to agree with him.

	Bruce
-- 
Can you get your operating system fixed when you need it?
Linux - the supportable operating system. http://www.debian.org/support.html
Bruce Perens K6BP   bruce@debian.org   NEW PHONE NUMBER: 510-620-3502

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: When to get the upstream maintainer involved.
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca>

References:
- When to get the upstream maintainer involved.
  - From: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens)

Prev by Date: Re: Debian Book Published
Next by Date: Re: When to get the upstream maintainer involved.
Previous by thread: When to get the upstream maintainer involved.
Next by thread: Re: When to get the upstream maintainer involved.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread