Re: packaging of rex in Debian

[Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>]

Hi Alex,

Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> >>I think rex is good enough. or rex-orchestration is you want to spell out that
> >>rex is an orchestration tool.
> >... rex-orchestration sounds better, because ...
> 
> rex-orchestration sounds good, but I think it is way to long.
> What about rexify ?

Doesn't sound that bad, especially if the project is associated with
that name.

>  www.refixy.org is the site of the project.

I assume you meant http://www.rexify.org/ :-)

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE