Re: packaging of rex in Debian
Hi,
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday 19 March 2015 15:34:32 Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> > I do not like librex-perl as it is not a module but a tool.
Then librex-perl is definitely the wrong name, yes.
> > Can I go with rex-perl ? or simply rex ?
I'd prefer "rex" of those two, but ...
> I think rex is good enough. or rex-orchestration is you want to spell out that
> rex is an orchestration tool.
... rex-orchestration sounds better, because ...
> I hope people won't confuse it with rexx (from regina-rexx package)
... I already ran into this just now, wondering what rex has to do
with Perl. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Reply to: