Re: New upstream versions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 16/02/14 17:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting gregor herrmann (2014-02-16 17:54:18)
>> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:44:45 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>>
>>>> Daniel Lintott <daniel@serverb.co.uk> writes:
>>>>> Is it acceptable for any team member to prepare the update
>>>>> for the package? (Don't want to step on toes, as this is my
>>>>> first time working within a packaging team)
>>>> Definitely acceptable and even encouraged on this particular
>>>> team.
>>
>> Full ack! We definitely need more people working on getting those
>> new releases in.
>
> I fully agree!
>
>
>> (Just beware that a couple of packages use CDBS and are
>> maintained by Jonas; please check back with him when making
>> changes -- or just stick to the dh(1)-using packages for now :))
>
> No need to check with me (but I won't bite if you do), just go
> ahead!
>
> Only thing I kindly ask is that you keep package structure - i.e.
> don't rewrite rules file from CDBS to short-form dh (or vice versa,
> I guess).
>
> Oh, and ignore rumors that debian/control.in file complicates
> things: Just ignore that file if you are not a CDBS fanboy!
>
> If in doubt, then (as always!) check for and read
> debian/README.source.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> - Jonas
>
Thank you for all the advice! I shall endeavour to get some new
versions packaged, as I've currently got the time to spend working on it.
Regards
Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTAQF4AAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJ5UMH/2var15T1KB91euVjSvU1YbW
fDyA1RZAVsdrOOLZEBfA5VPc2Un9bWy9bU6XKsfL1wjxrwE7LVM9Hr1mHGXq85H/
LMqTzFy1KkxJRtr1fGeoutV23G/BhPcDLG4FHPQalmY62H9neFCfbfQvVGXfy8iG
FehxJ0SCNNZhXggDxTKJknvnm4wgrFraINUT1MHIDb/OWNFD6jkODNjEAWWZm0QP
0YDPMJJ09UfAT5X+f3C2QzYb1C2V3X6xxQp9aghU8z2Ib5yiYphiZw8hoygFnV9F
n2xlFMWzyC534jngsGKZiDgesF3H2u1L6QWowo5V9Zq1NSRSX9J8czf998qHExc=
=glmp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: