On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:19:26 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > at the low-hanging fruits (LHF) session we just had, we've listed > "our" RC buggy leaf packages (no reverse-dependency), and sorted this > list by popcon ("installed") order. Thanks alot to you and dam for pushing this and coming up with this nice list! > libnet-irc-perl [popcon: 386] IIRC, this RC bug is a bit controversial -- Axel? > libregexp-grammars-perl [popcon: 38] IIRC, this is some nasty upstream bug where various people actively work on it, which should be fixed in some future perl release. Carnil might know more ... (In general: adding "no upstream reaction" to the criteria would be nice, albeit even more complicated ...) > Do we want to remove the packages with popcon < N from the archive? > How about N=50 or 100? After looking at the list, N=50 sounds like a nice cutoff to me. > As a side note, would anyone find it fun to automate building this > list, and sending the results to the list e.g. every 2 or 3 months? I'd have fun to see the output of the not-yet-written script :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Pink Floyd: In the flesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature