On Wed, 28 May 2014 09:41:54 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Tuesday 27 May 2014 23:30:48 gregor herrmann wrote: > > But before that we should agree on what we'll use instead; and I'm > > not sure that Config::Model::Dpkg will do the right thing here ... > > (libmodule-corelist-perl is already up to date). > > Dominique? > I don't think that Config::Model::Dpkg::Dependency will correctly detect that > Module::Build was removed from corelist. I guess so as well. And even if it would, I'm no sure how to express a Dependency like libmodules-build-perl >= x OR ( perl >= y AND perl << 5.20 ) > The simplest solution is to blacklist Module::Build and CGI and consider that > they were never part of corelist. This way cme will remove the alternate > dependency. > Thoughts ? Let's put it this way: I also don't have a better idea :) (And maybe we need the same for other deprecated/removed modules? The perl and/or the lintian source package(s) should have some machinery for detecting/listing them.) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bob Dylan: Down the Highway
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature