On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 15:33:50 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > <comment mode="gr(e|a)ybeard> > > I vaguely remember that in the olden days there were/was one or more > > people who preferred to be in Maintainer for packages they brought > > into the group. > > Maybe this "should" comes from thess pre-historic times. > > </comment> > I think I have a vague memory of something similar too, with the > additional flash that those people later handed "primary maintenance" > to the group, setting Maintainer to pkg-perl... etc so their reasoning > for having themselves in Maintainer, whatever these were, are no > longer actual. Ack, thanks for adding this piece of information, which matches my fuzzy memory. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Rigmor Gustafsson: It's Been So Long
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature