[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Wording of debian/control handling in Debian Perl Group Policy

On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 15:33:50 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:

> > <comment mode="gr(e|a)ybeard>
> > I vaguely remember that in the olden days there were/was one or more
> > people who preferred to be in Maintainer for packages they brought
> > into the group.
> > Maybe this "should" comes from thess pre-historic times.
> > </comment>
> I think I have a vague memory of something similar too, with the 
> additional flash that those people later handed "primary maintenance" 
> to the group, setting Maintainer to pkg-perl... etc so their reasoning 
> for having themselves in Maintainer, whatever these were, are no 
> longer actual.

Ack, thanks for adding this piece of information, which matches my
fuzzy memory.


 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Rigmor Gustafsson: It's Been So Long

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature

Reply to: