-=| Salvatore Bonaccorso, 08.03.2014 14:28:54 +0100 |=- > Hi Debian Perl Group :) > > I noticed that we have a 'should' in the Debian Perl Group Policy > about the Maintainer field in debian/control. I think we always > required that packages maintained in the pkg-perl group repositories > have that fields actually set to > pkg-perl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org . > > Any objection if I commit the attached patch to the policy (changing > the should to a must requirement). If the diverging packages are only those from your recent mail (a handful), then it seems to me we have a clearly followed policy already. So 'must' is as good as 'should'. OTOH, not having pkg-perl-maintainers at Maintainer: would prevent the bug reports reaching the group, right? I'd say this is not good at all, and must be fixed. So, 'must' it should be, then. :) -- dam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature