[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Wording of debian/control handling in Debian Perl Group Policy

On Saturday 08 March 2014 17:47:55 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> OTOH, not having pkg-perl-maintainers at Maintainer: would prevent the 
> bug reports reaching the group, right? I'd say this is not good at 
> all, and must be fixed. So, 'must' it should be, then.

For the record, Maintainer's field is also used by config-model-dpkg to 
compute a correct default value for Vcs-* fields (perl and ruby-extras teams). [1]

All the best

Dod (slowly coming back after vacations)

[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libconfig-model-dpkg-perl.git;a=blobdiff;f=lib/Config/Model/models/Dpkg/Control/Source.pl;h=492d7ddcca9423027978961c83aea36c8a71d71d;hp=6361f6010603c8c8676efbde8521c7b609fa2e1a;hb=b912ebbf47733fa1152f9ebea851502743af05a5;hpb=fc90fbebdde493345a1b86ad77405c9323c6a3fa

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: