Hi, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I noticed that we have a 'should' in the Debian Perl Group Policy > about the Maintainer field in debian/control. I think we always > required that packages maintained in the pkg-perl group repositories > have that fields actually set to > pkg-perl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org . > > Any objection if I commit the attached patch to the policy (changing > the should to a must requirement). No objection from my side -- despite I sometimes thought if it would make sense to use pkg-perl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org in Uploaders for modules developped by myself. But I always came to the conclusion that it doesn't make much sense. :-) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature