On 08/21/2013 07:01 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > The tags look a bit unconventional: [...] > and the line in PET for libcrypt-gcrypt-perl also looks fancy :) > (But this might be a PET issue ...) > > And the branches are also a bit untypical: [...] > (No upstream, but a debian branch.) yep, sorry about that: i changed the arrangement because i was doing more work on Crypt::GCrypt as part of upstream, so it made more sense for me to have master be upstream's master, and "debian" be the debian packaging. I also changed the tags (starting after 1.24) to have the upstream name in them rather than being ambiguous [0]. I could be convinced to change any of these practices if they're problematic for the debian perl team, and someone wants to help me learn a better way to do things, though. Thanks for all your work on keeping the repos in healthy shape. --dkg [0] https://www.debian-administration.org/users/dkg/weblog/81
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature