On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:53:18 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > Looking at PET [0], I noticed that some packages don't have all tags > > (and sometimes more) not pushed: > > libcrypt-gcrypt-perl > just getting to this now, sorry. No worries, and thanks for pushing your changes. > the tags for libcrypt-gcrypt-perl are there, but the repo was a little > bit disorganized due to some large-ish changes in how i'm tracking > upstream with the debian packaging branch. I think this is sorted now, > though i had to jump branch labels over (in a non-fastforward push) to > make sure the new setup reflects my current work on the package. Hm, gbp-pull failed so I just re-cloned the repo from scratch. > please let me know if anyone has any problems with it. The tags look a bit unconventional: % git tag 1.26 Crypt_GCrypt_1.25 Crypt_GCrypt_1.26 Crypt_GCrypt_debian/1.25-1 Crypt_GCrypt_debian/1.26-1 debian/1.22-1 debian/1.23-1 debian/1.24-1 upstream/1.21 upstream/1.22 upstream/1.23 upstream/1.24 and the line in PET for libcrypt-gcrypt-perl also looks fancy :) (But this might be a PET issue ...) And the branches are also a bit untypical: % git br -a debian * master pristine-tar remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/debian remotes/origin/master remotes/origin/pristine-tar (No upstream, but a debian branch.) I guess in practice this means that support by our tools and by humans is a bit more difficult than with a more "standard" setup. Anyway, it's good to have the current status in our common repo :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: George Harrison: Beware Of Darkness
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature