[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#663182: Possible solution

On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:13:30 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:

> I'd like to bring few more arguments to consideration.

And we should finally resolve this question :)
> I forgot to CC to David Paleino when I posted my idea of wrapper script so I 
> wrote to him and he replied with another good argument:
> >   I think that, while the wrapper script is a good technical solution, it'll
> >   vastly reduce the usefulness of the package, and it will diverge it from
> >   what upstream distributes. This way we introduce a delta between Debian
> >   (and its derivatives) and all other *nix distributions with that package.
> >   We can consider this important or not, but we should take it into
> >   consideration IMVHO.

The same is true for libmysql-diff-perl :)
Anyway, I'm fine with renaming "our" mysqldiff to something else, my
current favourite being mysqlschemadiff. Comments?

Two thoughts:
- In case we got that way mysql-utilities should probably
  Breaks/Replaces the then old libmysql-diff-perl
- 664120 should probably cloned to mysql-utilities


 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Donovan: Epistle To Dippy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: