Hi On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:08:11PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:25:18 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > > I've committed the change to the versioned URL. > > Thanks for noticing and fixing this. > > > One final thought, as i'm looking at this stuff: i'm not sure why we > > want the X-Comment: sub-sections per license, instead of just including > > the location of the license in the body directly? Is this recommended > > somewhere? > > Good question; it was added by Salvatore and I assumed he had a good > reason for it :) > If it's not needed I'd rather see it removed since it's not exactly > beautiful IMO. Ok, if we want we could, as in examples in the revision 59 of DEP5 simply "merge" the X-Comment part into the the text-part of the License: section. The X-Comment part is not strictly needed as comment. I have changed it as asked by Daniel Kahn Gillmor. Bests Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature