On 10/22/2009 12:24 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Make sure to verify if that newer revision of policy is then followed. Yeah, it looks like it is compatible. The current revision (59) is pretty simple stuff, and we generate pretty simple stuff. this is good! I've committed the change to the versioned URL. One final thought, as i'm looking at this stuff: i'm not sure why we want the X-Comment: sub-sections per license, instead of just including the location of the license in the body directly? Is this recommended somewhere? --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature