Re: Dual-Life Modules
This is an old email now, but thanks all for your input here.
I note that Test::Simple 0.92 is now in unstable:
libtest-simple-perl | 0.92-1 | unstable | source, all
and the new File::Temp too:
libfile-temp-perl | 0.22-1 | unstable | source, all
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard<dr@jones.dk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:14:10AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:09:45 +0100, Tim Retout wrote:
>>
>>> This was fixed. But some of the buildds for less common
>>> architectures have not updated their copy of sbuild
>>
>>... like amd64 :)
>
> For the particular case of sympa that architechture wasn't stalled, as I
> uploaded for that architecture (compiling using pbuilder+cowbuilder
> which is less flawed IME).
>
>
> - Jonas
>
> - --
> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
> [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJKei6qAAoJECx8MUbBoAEhI4wP/R1KuL3/iw5YX3/fYz5GDkgc
> qaItY9Lm68c6aiuw5B1lxI5xQacUFcNv1Jjev6aGuEsFwz71l+xNyOYtAaTzr46G
> 6amltEV98WPTi9zLAmAt0jZNDVtwmiux9nupbjvrLcs460TqDQqdaXF7GP/kGmFh
> yAF5eJO5o1vxEZnCz1fqTKekWws7cuwsFgLg9THbk8H2FbdsMqfqvcWlH6q5NO1C
> j6GPEPMp0fwiL0te1PdCCpdTOAK6wKX4Ct2z++i/+vRfrlihi5utOnX4fq44t4Uq
> U8VQGh7Hvnaf1LR6TT9ijGR4DJBGXdnBb0noJDsHMpXLDWMy+kDcAa+iH2PtYvrl
> i7K/sQ5nFTorX4hVDhCBL97LH4/C3aR1Q05lRCFtf3OnG9ZsEDITdoXZxle29ZZF
> sYyXKR7tYXWvnvYOJjfju2uy3qWnmzw0lWYtk8HoIx1K3HMupLUUHMrNPB7i9S0K
> Y2FpePhFWRTfadeRSnCyPNEM8FKtV0S2EsZT3lEIwRq0M6AR0GH6Y3eSSPjW7uYD
> Nsh0HwDX4DUXbF2sspcccgKqF55TfdUitwWlh8qyvGJr7nUEOFLWv0+WJzyc3UbP
> fbKNKa+az1uhShxzLC44qpHipA0GX+uFP7YA1/TahVXDoh6Mm8qGiW8335B9PCn+
> OTPS4is0HTgZMKB7jf0W
> =lcrD
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-perl-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: