-=| Xavier Oswald, Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:48:45PM +0100 |=- > On 11:33 Mon 05 Jan , Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > I generally agree with Niko's doubt (expressed in that bug report) > > whether this question is needed at all. > > > > What do you think? > > 1) drop debconf, remove the index on purge unconditionally > > Or as said bu Niko, rewrite/update the script to query the debconf databaseo, > but I think you can drop debconf. Yeah, I fixed this (in SVN trunk), but realized that I may have wasted my time fixing something that is better gone. This is why I ask for others' oppinion -- shall debconf usage be fixed (incl. lowered priority) or dropped completely. -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature