On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:33:28 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > Hm, I guess "discouraged" is clearer and roughly what I tried to > > express with "not actively using"; "forbidden" seems difficult > > because a DD in theory still can decide to upload a package with > > DM-U-A. (And I'd rather not have the "case-by-case basis" written > > down because that leads to the mess we have now :)) > "discouraged" feels right. It allows for case-by-case in any case ;-) Ok, I've changed it now from "is not actively using it." to "its use is discouraged." (it being the NM concept / the approach). Other comments? Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Ostbahn-Kurti & Die Chefpartie: Nochschicht (88)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature