On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:58:40 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > I'm really considering rejecting this module just for being > > crappy: > I agree it is crappy. > 1. fix the above in a series of patches and send them upstream (last > release in 2005) > > 2. rewrite it from scratch and patch clive to use IO::PagerNG > > 3. forget about IO::Pager and patch clive to not use it > IO::Pager is only used in the --print-cache option and I guess users > can pipe its output to a pager themselves anyway > > What do others think is best? I think option 3 is fine - having to use a pager is not really uncommon on linux machines :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: John Zorn: Tzalim (Ribot)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature