On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:58:40 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > I'm really considering rejecting this module just for being
> > crappy:
> I agree it is crappy.
> 1. fix the above in a series of patches and send them upstream (last
> release in 2005)
>
> 2. rewrite it from scratch and patch clive to use IO::PagerNG
>
> 3. forget about IO::Pager and patch clive to not use it
> IO::Pager is only used in the --print-cache option and I guess users
> can pipe its output to a pager themselves anyway
>
> What do others think is best?
I think option 3 is fine - having to use a pager is not really
uncommon on linux machines :)
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
`- NP: John Zorn: Tzalim (Ribot)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature