On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:34:25 +0200, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote: > > Also helpful are consistent informations -- i.e. not having various > > different years (of course year can differ for different files but if > > there is just one .pm file and it has different informations then the > > README, that's confusing). > Can CPANTS maybe have a test for a LICENSE and COPYRIGHT file gabor? I have to admit that I'm not really happy with COPYING files. It doesn't help to have a copy of the GPL or whatever in the tarball, what's needed is an explicit statement "I hold the copyright and I released under $license." But in general I of course agree that some clear form might help both debian and perl. > Hopefully debian-perl is the egg, and people will soon realize it has > grown into a lovely chicken. :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- BOFH excuse #187: Reformatting Page. Wait...
Description: Digital signature