Re: Conflicts with a package with same priority : optional
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:39:29 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote:
>
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities
>>
>> Should I consider, in a future release, updating the priority field of
>> libiptables-parse-perl and libiptables-chainmgr-perl from optional to
>> extra ? in order to avoid conflicts with psad whose priority is set to
>> optional as well.
>
> As the two perl packages have a versioned conflict (because they are
> now dependencies of psad instead of being inlcuded) I don't think
> this policy section applies here; in fact psad and libiptables-*-perl
> must even be installed together.
Ok, thanks for you point of view.
- --
Franck Joncourt
http://debian.org - http://smhteam.info/wiki/
Fingerprint : C10E D1D0 EF70 0A2A CACF 9A3C C490 534E 75C0 89FE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkhZcoEACgkQxJBTTnXAif7w4QCfSKJMeHMba3bGfVbsUU8yeyI9
F0UAmwTf44bnH532ATIsEmE9FxE0KVKe
=YZgm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: