-=| gregor herrmann, Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 06:51:12PM +0200 |=- > On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:46:02 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > We could probably call them without the initial "lib"? > > For example, bundle-test-perl. > > if a lib(rary) Foo::Bar is named libfoo-bar-perl, then a bundle Bla > Blubb could be called bundlebla-blubb-perl, maybe. > (But I don't object to the dash after bundle either.) I was thinking about simple perl-$bundlename or perl-bundle-$bundlename. I don't like that -perl is a suffix and while it is not feasible to change that for the perl _module_ packages, bundles have no existing practice so we have the freedom to choose. BTW, does one have a list of the bundles it would be nice to have? -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature