On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:46:02 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Bundles should not, IMHO, be called just like > regular CPAN packages, as they are not providing any modules with that > name (i.e., having libbundle-test-perl would be plainly wrong in my > opinion, as users would expect having Bundle/Test.pm in it just for > consistency). Ack > We could probably call them without the initial "lib"? > For example, bundle-test-perl. if a lib(rary) Foo::Bar is named libfoo-bar-perl, then a bundle Bla Blubb could be called bundlebla-blubb-perl, maybe. (But I don't object to the dash after bundle either.) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Sinéad O'Connor: The State I'm In
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature