On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:01:37 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > My problem with this are DMs that happen to be in a pkg-perl package's > > Uploaders and that weren't advocated by pkg-perl members. > Umh... I am still not sure about what I think on this topic ;-) Dam: > It's been shown over and over that you are more paranoid than me, and > I do welcome that - but still, here is my point: Thanks for your comments, Gunnar! > I think that over-elaborating on rules to allow or restrict who can > upload what, which XS fields to use and the rules on the Uploaders > field's handling is a net waste of energy... Sure, I think a balance between some protection and manageability is important. But IMO the current proposal (cf. policy.pod.draft) is a viable compromise; there's some action needed both from DMs and DDs but not really much, and it should ensure that some attention is paid. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- BOFH excuse #256: You need to install an RTFM interface.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature