Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 12.03.2006, 12:16 +0100 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > > I've seen that current consensus seems to use another directory for > > that but I don't see the point of another directory. I think that by > > "maintainership" Ivo only means that he wants his name in the > > Maintainer field. He probably doesn't matter if other people help him > > maintain the package ? Am I right Ivo ? > > > > So IMO, he can keep his name in the Maintainer field and still use the > > same directory in the repository. BTW, I'll probably do this for my > > perl packages. > > The risk is that someone from the team might forget to check if the > package is team maintained and might -- oh my god -- actually upload a > fixed version of a packages maintained by someone else. Let's just say that everyone who wants his package(s) to remain untouched should keep them in /people/<username>/. Any packages in /packages/ should be admissible for co-maintenance AKA interference without explicit permission.
Attachment:
pgpFkRJ0gCO_0.pgp
Description: PGP signature