Re: Lintian reports for etch

To: Carlo Segre <segre@iit.edu>
Cc: debian-perl@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Lintian reports for etch
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:56:27 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87hcvpxppg.fsf@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0612191925340.16099@oxide.phys.iit.edu> (Carlo Segre's message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:27:34 -0600 (CST)")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0612191925340.16099@oxide.phys.iit.edu>

Carlo Segre <segre@iit.edu> writes:
> http://merkel.debian.org/~ballombe/lintian-etch-i386/reports/mDebian_Perl_Group.html
>
> What is the consensus about fixing these for etch?  If we do decide to
> clean up, what priority shall we put on the new uploads and will we
> overwhelm the release managers?

Please do not ask the release team to accept very minor fixes. Thanks.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #396:
Mail server hit by UniSpammer.

Attachment: pgpCeD7oVhTmK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lintian reports for etch
  - From: Carlo Segre <segre@iit.edu>

References:
- Lintian reports for etch
  - From: Carlo Segre <segre@iit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Lintian reports for etch
Next by Date: Re: Lintian reports for etch
Previous by thread: Re: Lintian reports for etch
Next by thread: Re: Lintian reports for etch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread