[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libxml-libxml-xpathcontext-perl_0.07-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> So the question is: must we _always_ apply the Perl policy for naming
> packages, or can we bypass that policy when the name becomes rdeundant
> like here?

A while ago I suggested allowing perl module packages to be named other
than as the policy requires, as long as they also provided the name
required by the policy. This never happened, but I still think it's a
good idea for cases like this one.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: