Re: libdbd-sqlite-perl and libdbd-sqlite2-perl
- To: debian-perl@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: libdbd-sqlite-perl and libdbd-sqlite2-perl
- From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:48:33 -0600
- Message-id: <20050416004833.GA6699@jacinta.casa>
- In-reply-to: <1112399327.11989.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <20050318143121.GA25709@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503181445110.18404@diku.intranet.braincells.com> <20050322041651.GB1652@jacinta.casa> <20050322172824.GC10654@jacinta.casa> <20050324203600.GA25548@jacinta.casa> <20050401232603.GC6354@jacinta.casa> <1112399327.11989.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:48:47AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 01.04.2005, 17:26 -0600 schrieb Marcelo E. Magallon:
> > Can someone *please* say something regarding my SVN access?
>
> You can get that pretty quick, but before having these packages under
> DPG's maintainership I'd rather hear a second opinion (might be the
> packages former maintainers, or someone from the DPG that has better
> knowledge of these things than me).
It seems there isn't much interest in this, is there? It's been two
weeks...
> > which takes any person 5 minutes to read and it takes another 5
> > minutes to write an email which basically says "sorry, no cigar".
>
> Just a hint: Including links to the mails in the archive is usually
> more convenient than the uid (or is it?)
Sorry, not for me. I work mostly off-line... you do remember back then
Germany only had dial-up, right? I keep an archive of the mailing
lists that I track, and it's really easy to find emails by Message-Id.
(Such an archive is available on master or gluck, I think). It's
really hard for me to find them when someone refers to them by URL.
I'll try to accomodate that, too, nevertheless.
--
Marcelo
Reply to: