[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libcgi-perl?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Raphael Hertzog, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>Le Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 07:20:33PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki écrivait:
>> Should I prepare libcgi-pm-perl package with new CGI.pm file? Or
>> put new CGI.pm to my libapache-asp-perl (it will overwrite file from
>> perl-5.005)? 
>
>I vote for updating the modules contained in the perl-5.005 package.

So, I would release a new perl-5.005 package when a new CGI.pm was
released?  This doesn't sound real feasible to me.  Why wouldn't a new
libcgi-pm-perl package be released, it can just divert or replaces parts 
of the package as it needs to.

So, is there anything that can be done about libcgi-perl = CGI-Modules?

Darren
- -- 
<torin@daft.com> <http://www.daft.com/~torin> <torin@debian.org> <torin@io.com>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-800-921-4996
@ Sysadmin, webweaver, postmaster for hire. C/Perl/CGI/Pilot programmer/tutor @
@		     Make a little hot-tub in your soul.		      @

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBN4P/MrQuaHP6LBjxAQGSrAP9Gobc3/Igd75vLN3q2wc4AvPq+/3y7uy/
b81Yijsn/1phBoNp0G77kh+ZGCsRwZHjdjpxn+RXjx1Vf4RawUXF9rVf+MD0IgTe
9oUbISpnFzKCE1vKmCqzewg28pNYWOxg8Q61Sb/r+ms9CpyRFeyMqRDJ2QthOcwk
61saAbkBP20=
=9Cpb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: