Re: OOo2 backport to Sarge
Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 22:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > > b) you remove ENABLE_HUNSPELL? Why? And you really want to use internal
> > > hunspell to not have to backport other packages than OOo. You just need
> > > to add the hunspell package to ooo-build/src. What I incidentially
> > > forgot in 2.0.0-2 so it doesn't appear in the diff. Will be fixed for
> > > - -3.
> > Oups, no, I did not want to remove it, I accidentally removed one line
> > too much. If you take a look at it carefully, I just wanted to include
> > the condition about Sarge in the condition about Ubuntu. That's it.
>
> Which is broken, too. Are we Ubuntu? no. we are Debian so the sarge
> clause has to be in the Debian clause otherwise it has no effect because
> on Debian the Debian clause will be used. Always.
No, look carefully, I put it in the else clause of the 'ifeq "$(DIST)"
"Ubuntu"'. So, if it is Ubuntu, it does not even try to check if it is
Sarge.
And there is no Debian clause here.
> > When do you plan to upload -3? Or, where can we find it in the meantime,
> > to base my trials on it?
>
> Well, since the python 2.4 transition will start mid-November I don't
> think it makes that much sense to upload it now and then have to
> reupload it then. OTOH, end of November is 2.0.1 release.
> -> Let's see...
I wondered to be able to help with the backport as soon as possible.
That's why I also ask where I could get the sources in the meantime.
> > > c) wrt gamin and fam, you are right, but that's minor. You currently
> > > need -d for the build-depends anyway so... But I can add it for -3, yes..
> > Thanks
>
> Added, but a bit better solved ;)
>
> > I have yet another problem later, which is due to my build taking place
> > in a x86 chroot on and AMD64 Debian. If someone has got an idea about it
> > or wants more info... Otherwise, don't worry, I will try to sort this
> > out myself.
>
> Why do you need that? Do you want do to a backport?
Yes, I thought the subject was straight-forward. :-D
> I am already doing one (which I can do with -2 already). Give people
> some time to actually build/try/test it...
I want to participate, and I will apparently use a slightly different
one, because I will probably try to remove the dependency to KDE also.
If you could send me the latest debian/rules, I could work for myself on it.
> Regards,
Regards
> Rene
Reply to: