[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#178378: marked as done (openoffice.org: New in 1.0.2 : text with encapsulated Postcript figures do not print)



Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:00:35 +0200
with message-id <1082152834.3113.7.camel@feathers>
and subject line Bug#178378: openoffice.org: New in 1.0.2 : text with encapsulated Postcript figures do not print -- close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2003 18:18:56 +0000
>From charpent@bacbuc.dyndns.org Sat Jan 25 12:18:55 2003
Return-path: <charpent@bacbuc.dyndns.org>
Received: from aph-aug-102-1-5-27.abo.wanadoo.fr (aleph) [80.15.78.27] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18cUtL-0003W7-00; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:18:55 -0600
Received: from yod.bacbuc.fdn.fr
	([193.57.55.5] helo=yod ident=mail)
	by aleph with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18cUtJ-0006MF-00; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 19:18:53 +0100
Received: from charpent by yod with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18cUtI-0001mq-00; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 19:18:52 +0100
From: Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent@bacbuc.dyndns.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org: New in 1.0.2 : text with encapsulated Postcript figures do not print
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 19:18:52 +0100
Message-Id: <E18cUtI-0001mq-00@yod>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,SUPERLONG_LINE
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: normal

Dear maintainers,

I just stumbled on a bug that didn't occur in 1.0.1 : I am unable to print
(via CUPS) a text document containing Encapsulated Postscript files. CUPS
aborts the job with a "no pages found" error.

This didn't happen with OOo 1.0.1, a few hours ago. Interestingly, it als happens with a parallel version of OpenOfice.org 1.0.2 "installed" from the Oficial Linux tarball from www.openoffice.org. So it might be an upstream bug.

I might provide you with a small sample of a .sxw text document along with the EPS file and the ps "print file".

Sincerely,

					Emmanuel Charpentier 

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux yod 2.4.20 #1 Thu Dec 26 12:48:34 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  openoffice.org-bin            1.0.2-1    OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-files   1.0.2-1+1  Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-en        1.0.2-1    English (US) language package for 
ii  openoffice.org-l10n-fr        1.0.2-1    French language package for openof


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 178378-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 22:00:42 +0000
>From halls@debian.org Fri Apr 16 15:00:41 2004
Return-path: <halls@debian.org>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BEbO5-0006dV-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:00:41 -0700
Received: from [212.227.126.209] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
	by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1BEbO4-0000r0-00
	for 178378-close@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:00:40 +0200
Received: from [80.128.236.86] (helo=wallace.thehalls.de)
	by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1BEbO4-0004A0-00
	for 178378-close@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:00:40 +0200
Received: from feathers (feathers [192.168.10.4])
	by wallace.thehalls.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CBD9811
	for <178378-close@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:53:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by feathers (Postfix, from userid 1050)
	id E3FED803C; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:00:35 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#178378: openoffice.org: New in 1.0.2 : text with
	encapsulated Postcript figures do not print -- close
From: Chris Halls <halls@debian.org>
To: 178378-close@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <1075375600.8104.39.camel@scooby.cmt>
References: <E18cUtI-0001mq-00@yod> <20030127144957.GA14030@shawn.gmx.de>
	 <87znpm4es5.fsf@myxomop.com>  <3E358B72.8070604@bacbuc.dyndns.org>
	 <1075375600.8104.39.camel@scooby.cmt>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1082152834.3113.7.camel@feathers>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:00:35 +0200
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:b46e2b357ea7d4f6cadf4c99fb902606
Delivered-To: 178378-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 12:26, Chris Halls wrote:
> tags 178378 + moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 20:41, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> > Addendum to my last reply
> > 
> > Here's a partial copy of the CUPS error_log, snapshotted between a 
> > /etc/init.d/cupsys start and a /etc/init.d/cupsys stop. It seeps that 
> > cupsys tries to restart old failed jobs.
> > 
> > As to the possible cause, I'm lost ...
> 
> Hi Emmanuel,
> 
> With the release of OOo 1.1.0, I wonder if you still see this problem? 
> Since ghostscript was able to display the generated file correctly, I'm
> still not sure that this really is a problem with openoffice itself. 
> What do you think?
> 
> Chris

Hi Emmanuel,

I've not heard anything from you for 3 months so I guess that means this
isn't a problem for you any more; I certainly haven't heard of any
reports of this problem still happening with 1.1.x so I'm closing this
bug.

Chris



Reply to: