[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#188324: marked as done (openoffice 1.0.2 package? crash)



Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:05:39 +0200
with message-id <1082153139.3115.11.camel@feathers>
and subject line Bug#188324: libc6 status of the problem -- close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2003 11:05:30 +0000
>From jcervera@jestudio.aq.upm.es Wed Apr 09 06:05:30 2003
Return-path: <jcervera@jestudio.aq.upm.es>
Received: from jestudio.aq.upm.es [138.100.41.101] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 193DOT-0007gf-00; Wed, 09 Apr 2003 06:05:30 -0500
Received: from jcervera by jestudio.aq.upm.es with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 193DQW-00012x-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 09 Apr 2003 13:07:36 +0200
From: Jaime Cervera <jcervera@aq.upm.es>
Organization: Escuela =?iso-8859-1?q?T=E9cnica=20Superior=20de?= Arquitectura
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: openoffice 1.0.2 package? crash
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:07:35 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200304091307.35971.jcervera@aq.upm.es>
Sender: Jaime Cervera <jcervera@jestudio.aq.upm.es>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NOSPAM_INC,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_KMAIL
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org

 (I've sent apart a copy to debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org)

I must report a problem, that I do'nt know is a debian package
problem or a openoffice problem: 
with oo 1.0.1 I've been using without problems the unixodbc 
driver to access Postgresql tables from oowriter, 
but as I've upgraded to 1.0.2 the conexion to the database
is got from the data window in oowriter, and even the table data
is accesed on that window but when the cursor focuses
the text window after touching the data region, oowriter crahses silently.

I thougt it was a bug from the odbc driver, but I've realized thet the same 
problem occurs with a jdbc driver for Postgresql (class org.postgresql.Driver)
from   http://jdbc.postgresql.org/ (pg73jdbc2.jar) and even with a jdbc
driver for a MySQL database (http://www.mysql.com/downloads/api-jdbc.html, 
connector/J 3.0  com.mysql.jdbc.Driver class).

openoffice packages installed from the
deb http://ftp.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be/pub/mirror/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/ 
woody main contrib
openoffice.org_1.0.2-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-bin_1.0.2-1woody3_i386.deb
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.2-2+1_all.deb
openoffice.org-help-en_1.0.2-2_all.deb
oopenoffice.org-l10n-en_1.0.2-2_all.deb
penoffice.org-help-es_0.20020222-2_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.0.2-2_all.deb

uname -a
Linux jestudio.aq.upm.es 2.4.18 #2 SMP Wed Dec 4 18:18:35 CET 2002 i686 
unknown

dpkg -s libc6 | grep ^Version
Version: 2.3.1-14

I've not enough skill to know if it is a 1.0.2 problem or a debian build 
problem.

Regards

--------------------------------------------------------------
Jaime Cervera Bravo.   (jcervera@aq.upm.es)
Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
--------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 188324-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 22:05:52 +0000
>From halls@debian.org Fri Apr 16 15:05:52 2004
Return-path: <halls@debian.org>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BEbT6-0006wu-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:05:52 -0700
Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
	by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1BEbT5-0000Kj-00
	for 188324-close@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:05:51 +0200
Received: from [80.128.230.203] (helo=wallace.thehalls.de)
	by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1BEbT5-0004fx-00
	for 188324-close@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:05:51 +0200
Received: from feathers (feathers [192.168.10.4])
	by wallace.thehalls.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3747E9811
	for <188324-close@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:58:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: by feathers (Postfix, from userid 1050)
	id 65413803C; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:05:39 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#188324: libc6 status of the problem -- close
From: Chris Halls <halls@debian.org>
To: 188324-close@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <200304281926.44623.jcervera@aq.upm.es>
References: <200304281926.44623.jcervera@aq.upm.es>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1082153139.3115.11.camel@feathers>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:05:39 +0200
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:b46e2b357ea7d4f6cadf4c99fb902606
Delivered-To: 188324-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 19:26, Jaime Cervera wrote:
> This is the final situation:
> With the 2.3.1-16        testing version of libc6 the problem is NOT solved
> 
> I've downgraded to 2.2.15 -11.5      version of libc6 
> (from  http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages ) and 
> the problem is dissapeared.
> 
> (by the way, the upgrade of the lib6 was due to a probe of a Tcl/Tk from
>  the testing branch)
> 
> Thanks to both Chris and Paul, and thanks to all guys that maintain the
> debian documentation.

Closing bug, thanks Jaime.



Reply to: