Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Is the licensing suitable to upload to the Debian archive? > > The license states: > > Permission to use, copy, redistribute is granted. Permission to > redistribute modifications in patch form is granted. Permission > to redistribute binaries made of modified sources is granted. > All other rights reserved. > > Is that acceptable? Looks OK so far. > > 2. We were asked by the ftpmasters not to create such small hyphenation > > packages alone [2]. How about creating a single package that > > includes both the dictionary and hyphenation, calling it > > myspell-sv-se and in addition, > > Provides: openoffice.org-hyphenation-sv, openoffice.org-hyphenation? > > If the same package really works in mozilla, perhaps people who don't use OO > will want to install it. Is it really correct to merge OO-only files > (hyphenation) with not-OO-only stuff (the dictionary)? That is what we are just discussing ;) > > 3. I guess this was to make the dictionary work with Mozilla? > > > > myspell-sv-1.3.8-6/debian$ cat myspell-sv-se.links > > /usr/share/myspell/dicts/sv_SE.aff /usr/share/myspell/dicts/sv-SE.aff > > /usr/share/myspell/dicts/sv_SE.dic /usr/share/myspell/dicts/sv-SE.dic > > Should I do the same? Well, either way is possible. You could rename the file for OOo and make that symlink or rename the file to be named with the - and change the entry for dictionary.lst. /me still prefers the symlink Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature